On January 25, 2021, the Supreme Court dismissed the emoluments cases because Donald Trump left office, rendering them moot. This important litigation made the American people aware of the pervasive corruption that resulted from a president maintaining a global business and accepting payments from foreign and domestic governments. Only Trump losing the presidency and leaving office ended these corrupt constitutional violations and the need for these groundbreaking lawsuits. 

Read our full statement here

On January 23, 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed a lawsuit against Donald J. Trump to stop him from violating the Constitution by illegally receiving payments from foreign governments.

The foreign emoluments clause of the Constitution prohibits Trump from receiving anything of value from foreign governments, including foreign government-owned businesses, without the approval of Congress. Since Trump has refused to divest from his businesses, he is now getting cash and favors from foreign governments, through guests and events at his hotels, leases in his buildings, and valuable real estate deals abroad. Trump does business with countries like China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, and now that he is President, his company’s acceptance of any benefits from the governments of those countries violates the Constitution. When Trump the president sits down to negotiate trade deals with these countries, the American people will have no way of knowing whether he will also be thinking about the profits of Trump the businessman.

Lawsuit Documents

Key milestones: On October 18, 2017, CREW and its co-plaintiffs presented their arguments before Judge Daniels in the Southern District of New York. Judge Daniels later granted the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appealed the decision, and on September 13, 2019, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit released an opinion ruling in CREW’s favor.  On October 28, 2019, Defendants filed a petition for rehearing en banc and won en banc in August 2020. Trump filed a petition for cert in the Supreme Court. On January 25, 2021, the Supreme Court dismissed this emoluments case because Donald Trump left office, rendering it moot.


  • January 23, 2017
  • June 9, 2017
  • June 9, 2017 - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
  • June 16, 2017 - Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman Amicus Curiae in Support of the Defendant
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017 - Definition of "Emolument" in English Language and Legal Dictionaries (1523 - 1806)
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 1
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 2
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 3
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 4
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 5
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 6
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 7
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 8
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 9
  • August 4, 2017 - Appendix A: "Emolument" in English Language Dictionaries (1604-1806) - Part 10
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017
  • August 4, 2017 - Declaration of Christopher C. Muller, PH.D
  • August 4, 2017 - CREW et al Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss
  • August 4, 2017 - Declaration of Rachel J Roginsky, ISHC
  • August 18, 2017 - Sarah P. Chayes Amica Curiae in Support of the Plaintiffs
  • August 18, 2017 - Senator Richard Blumenthal and Rep. John Coyers, Jr. Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the Plaintiffs
  • August 11, 2017 - 21 Scholars of Law Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the Plaintiffs
  • August 11, 2017 - Legal Historians' Amicus Curiae Brief on Behalf of Plaintiffs
  • August 11, 2017 - Brief of Former Government Ethics Officers as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs
  • September 19, 2017 - Scholar Seth Barrett Tillman's Motion to Appear Jointly with Judicial Education Project as Amici Curiae in Support of the Defendant
  • September 21, 2017 - Tillman's Motion For Leave to File Response to Legal Historians
  • September 21, 2017 - Order Denying Tillman's Motion For Leave to Respond To Amici Curiae by Legal Historians
  • September 22, 2017 - Defendant's Reply In Support of His Motion To Dismiss
  • October 3, 2017 - Legal Historian's Letter - Correction of Footnote
  • October 6, 2017 - Gupta Letter To The Court - Re: Notice of Supplemental Authority
  • October 7, 2017
  • October 18, 2017
  • October 25, 2017 - Deputy Assistant Attorney General Letter to The Court - Correction of A Misstatement
  • December 21, 2017
  • February 16, 2018
  • April 24, 2018
  • May 29, 2018 - Brief for Appellee President Donald J. Trump
  • June 5, 2018
  • June 27, 2018
  • July 15, 2019
  • September 13, 2019
  • October 28, 2019

Read More in Lawsuits