CREW V. DOJ – OLC
Update: On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to dismiss CREW’s complaint. Circuit Judge Pillard, a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, filed a dissenting opinion. CREW then filed a petition to rehear the case en banc. On August 14, 2019, that petition was denied.
CREW first sued DOJ for not releasing OLC opinions in 2013. In January 2017, an appeals court ruled on the proper way to request the memoranda, which CREW followed, but OLC still has not responded to CREW’s request. Therefore, CREW sued OLC on March 10, 2017 over failure to produce the records.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) must release opinions containing secret law on key issues produced by the Office of Legal Council (OLC), memoranda which DOJ has withheld in violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
OLC issues opinions establishing the executive branch’s authoritative position on what is and is not legal on subjects ranging from immigration to warfare to spying on civilians. One well-known memo justified the use of “enhanced interrogation” techniques like waterboarding, and OLC may have weighed in recently on the president’s immigration executive orders and other key issues. These decisions are secret law, as they govern the operations of the government without the American people knowing of their existence or what is in them.
CREW’s lawsuit seeks to force OLC’s secret law into view. The FOIA requires that DOJ must release all final opinions and adopted statements of policy to the public, but despite years of requests from CREW, they have not.
Lawsuit Documents
-
ComplaintMarch 10, 2017
-
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the ComplaintMay 3, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's MotionPlaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - June 19, 2017
-
Exhibit A to Plaintiff's OppositionJune 19, 2017
-
Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's MotionReply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Jul. 26, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to a Sur-replyPlaintiff's Motion for Leave to a Sur-reply and Supporting Memorandum - Aug. 7, 2017
-
Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Motion for LeaveAugust 7, 2017
-
Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's MotionDefendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave - August 17, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Its Leave MotionPlaintiff's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave - August 17, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Sur-reply in Opp. to Defendant MotionPlaintiff's Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Aug. 28, 2017
-
Notice of Supplemental AuthorityOctober 12, 2017
-
Exhibit to Notice of Supplemental AuthorityOctober 12, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's NoticePlaintiff's Response to Defendant's Notice of Supplemental Authority - October 13, 2017
-
Plaintiff's Supplemental Response to DefendantPlaintiff's Supplemental Response to Defendant's Notice of Supplemental Authority - Oct. 31, 2017
-
Plantiff's Statement Campaign for AccountabilityPlaintiff's Statement as to Whether this case is Related to Campaign for Accountability v. US DOJ - Feb. 9, 2018
-
Defendant's Statement Concerning RelatednessFebruary 16, 2018
-
Memorandum OpinionFebruary 18, 2018
-
OrderFebruary 18, 2018
-
Plaintiff's Motion for a Final Appealable OrderPlaintiff's Motion for a Final Appealable Order of Dismissal - March 26, 2018
-
Order Granting Defendant's Motion to DismissMarch 27, 2018
-
Notice of AppealApril 19, 2018
-
Brief of AppellantAugust 8, 2018
-
Joint AppendixAugust 8, 2018
-
OrderAugust 14, 2018
-
Campaign for Accountability Amicus BriefCampaign for Accountability & The Knight First Amendment Institute Amicus Brief in Support of Appellant - Aug. 15, 2018
-
Brief for AppelleeSeptember 28, 2018
-
Reply Brief of AppellantOctober 11, 2018
-
Judgement and OpinionApril 30, 2019
-
Petition for Rehearing En BancJune 10, 2019
-
Opposition to Petition for Rehearing En BancJuly 15, 2019
-
OrderAugust 14, 2019